CONCEPTUAL NOTE ON STATE, TRAIT, AND THE STATE-TRAIT DISTINCTION
CONCEPTUAL NOTE ON STATE, TRAIT, AND THE STATE-TRAIT DISTINCTION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.169
复制
发表时间：
1986-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
FRIDHANDLER, BM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FRIDHANDLER, BM
讨论的状态-特质的区别的概念基础，并建议的区别，虽然比以前认识到的更复杂，在概念上是可行的。英国石油公司艾伦和CR波凯（见记录1982-09834-001）的论点，即状态-特质的区别是任意的被拒绝。而不是试图减少状态-特质的区别到一个单一的维度，作者提出了4个重叠，但不同的维度作为当前的专业用途的区别：持续时间，连续与反应的表现，具体与抽象，和情境因果关系与个人因果关系。在这些维度和更广泛的发生和性格概念的各个方面之间画出了相似之处，状态和特质的概念被描述为这些更广泛概念在心理学中的应用。本文认为，对状态和特质概念的清晰理解将有助于理论和研究的发展。(42参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Discusses the conceptual bases of the state–trait distinction and suggests that the distinction, though more complex than previously appreciated, is conceptually viable. BP Allen and CR Potkay's (see record 1982-09834-001) contention that the state–trait distinction is arbitrary is rejected. Rather than attempting to reduce the state–trait distinction to a single dimension, the author proposes 4 overlapping but distinct dimensions as underlying current professional uses of the distinction: duration, continuous vs reactive manifestation, concreteness vs abstractness, and situational causality vs personal causality. Parallels are drawn between these dimensions and aspects of the broader concepts of occurrence and disposition, and the concepts of state and trait are described as applications in psychology of these broader concepts. It is argued that a clearer understanding of the concepts of state and trait will facilitate theory and research.(42 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)