Comparisons of blood pressure measurements by auscultation and Physiometrics Infrasonde recording techniques.
Comparisons of blood pressure measurements by auscultation and Physiometrics Infrasonde recording techniques.
复制标题
通过听诊法和物理测量次探空仪记录技术测量血压的比较。
DOI：
10.1161/01.hyp.2.4_pt_2.i8
复制
发表时间：
1980
期刊：
影响因子：
8.3
通讯作者：
B. Berg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Berg
将由生理测量学Infrasonde记录仪（SR-2型）测量的血压水平与利用标准水银血压计（Baumanometer）通过拜特同时测量的血压水平进行比较。这些测量是对1530名成年女性及其1760名15-17岁的青少年儿童进行的。间隔约3分钟测量两组血压，每组血压均使用连接到生理测量记录仪以及水银血压计的闭合袖带。生理测定法的重现性与听诊法相似。对于女性和女孩，通过生理测量法测量的收缩压的平均值几乎等于听诊法测量的收缩压的平均值;对于男孩，前一种方法的平均值超过后者约3 mm。对于所有三组，通过生理测量法测量的平均舒张压非常接近通过听诊法测量的柯氏音5（K5）压力。两种方法之间的相关系数分别为0.98的收缩压和0.93的舒张压的成年女性和0.94的收缩压的青少年。青少年的两种舒张压之间的相关性要小得多（0.69）。女性的收缩压和舒张压以及青少年的收缩压的生理测量结果与听诊测量结果一致，但青少年舒张压的一致性较低。已作出努力，这两种方法与其他人体测量变量之间的差异，但与这些变量的相关性低水平。
The levels of blood pressures measured by a Physiometrics Infrasonde recorder (model SR-2) were compared with the levels simultaneously measured byt auscultation utilizing a standard mercury sphygmomanometer (Baumanometer). The measurements were made on 1530 adult women and their 1760 adolescent children 15-17 years old. Two sets of blood pressures were taken about 3 minutes apart, each with an occluding cuff connected to the Physiometrics recorder as well as to the mercury sphygmomanometer. The reproducibility of the Physiometrics method was similar to that of the auscultation method. The means of the systolic pressures measured by the Physiometrics method were virtually equal to those of the auscultation method for women and girls; for boys, the means of the former method surpassed those of the latter by about 3 mm. The mean diastolic pressures by the Physiometric method were very close to the Korotkoff sound 5 (K5) pressure by the auscultation method for all three groups. The correlation coefficients between both methods were 0.98 for the systolic and 0.93 for the diastolic pressure of the adult women, and 0.94 for the systolic pressure of the adolescents. The correlations between the two diastolic pressures of adolescents were much less (0.69). The Physiometrics measurements were consistent with the measurements by auscultation for systolic and diastolic pressures of women and systolic pressure of adolescents, but the consistency was low for diastolic pressure of adolescents. An effort has been made to relate differences between the two methods with other anthropometric variables, but the correlations with these variables were of low level.