Letter by Knight et al regarding article, "Validation of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging blood-brain barrier permeability measurements by comparison with gold standard histology".
Letter by Knight et al regarding article, "Validation of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging blood-brain barrier permeability measurements by comparison with gold standard histology".
复制标题
Knight 等人关于文章“通过与金标准组织学比较验证体内磁共振成像血脑屏障渗透性测量”的信函。
DOI:
10.1161/strokeaha.111.633636
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
8.3
通讯作者:
Ewing,JamesR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Knight,RobertA;Nagaraja,TavarekereN;Ewing,JamesR
We read with great interest the recent paper by Hoffmann et al1 on the validation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. The authors reported that they measured changes in BBB permeability in rodent models of focal cerebral ischemia using MRI methods in conjunction with a Gd-based MRI contrast agent; they then validated these measures by comparing them with Cresyl violet histology and Evans Blue extravasation. The MRI-based estimates of vascular leakage were obtained using the Patlak graphical method to calculate the blood-to-brain transfer constant (Ki).In recent years, there has been a great deal of interest in the development of noninvasive imaging techniques capable of accurately measuring changes in acute BBB permeability after stroke to predict probability of hemorrhagic transformation. However, the authors appear to be unaware of a sizable body of work in this field that used MRI for such investigations; they only cite manuscripts that used computed tomography techniques in conjunction with Patlak plot methodology to estimate BBB permeability. We would like to bring to the authors’ attention several such studies, at least some of which deserved citations in their publication.