What’s wrong with rights? Social movements, law and liberal imagination
What’s wrong with rights? Social movements, law and liberal imagination
复制标题
社会运动、法律和自由主义想象力出了什么问题？
DOI：
10.1080/14742837.2019.1697666
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
E. Coburn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Coburn
这本书从马克思主义的角度对自由权利话语的霸权提出了彻底的挑战，开篇提出了以下问题：如果土著人民自古以来就与某些地方有关系，如果这些关系是他们在特定土地上持续存在的本体论、政治、精神和道德基础，为什么一些土著行为者在瑞士日内瓦等地的联合国等世界机构寻求对自己的土地提出主张？(p.（6）他们为什么用当代人权语言这样做？D'Souza的回答是，土著人民已经被人权话语中隐含的欺骗性但根本上误导性的愿望所俘虏。受自由权利承诺的诱惑，特别是他们的“生产能力...新的希望和一种能动性的感觉“（第19页），土著行动者向联合国这样的组织发出法律的和社会的呼吁，
This book, a thorough-going challenge to the hegemony of liberal rights discourse, from a Marxist perspective, opens with the following question: if Indigenous peoples have relationships with places from time immemorial, and if these relationships are the ontological, political, spiritual and moral grounds for their ongoing presence on specific lands, why do some Indigenous actors seek to make claims to their own lands at world bodies like the United Nations, in places like Geneva, Switzerland?(p. 6) And why do they do so in the contemporary language of human rights?D’Souza’s answer is that Indigenous peoples have been captured by beguiling but fundamentally misleading aspirations implicit in human rights discourses. Seduced by the liberal promise of rights, especially their ‘capacity to generate... new hopes and a feeling of agency’(p. 19), Indigenous actors make legal and social appeals to organisms like the United Nations,