Policy Alienation of Public Professionals
Policy Alienation of Public Professionals
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/14719030902798230
复制
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
Steijn, Bram
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tummers, Lars;Bekkers, Victor;Steijn, Bram
今天，许多公共专业人员感到与他们执行的政策方案疏远;也就是说，他们经历了“政策疏远”。这一点令人关切，因为要令人满意地执行，就需要对政策有某种认同。我们概念化的基础上工作异化的社会学概念的政策异化，并展示如何可以用于政策执行的研究。研究荷兰的专业人士实施新的工作残疾法令的情况下，我们观察到如何NPM的做法增加政策异化，因为一个功能失调的重点放在效率和结果。大量的政策变化和更严格的实施细则进一步加剧了政策异化。
Today, many public professionals feel estranged from the policy programmes they implement; that is, they experience 'policy alienation'. This is of concern as, for satisfactory implementation, some identification with the policy is required. We conceptualize policy alienation based on the sociological concept of work alienation, and show how this can be used in policy implementation research. Studying a Dutch case of professionals implementing a new work disability decree, we observe how NPM practices increase policy alienation because of a perceived dysfunctional focus on efficiency and results. A large number of policy changes and stricter implementation rules further increased policy alienation.