Exploring perceptions of stakeholder roles in ecosystem services coproduction
Exploring perceptions of stakeholder roles in ecosystem services coproduction
复制标题
探索利益相关者在生态系统服务共同生产中角色的认知
DOI：
10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101353
复制
发表时间：
2021-10
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
C. Jericó-daminello;B. Schröter;M. M. García-M.;Christian Albert
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Jericó-daminello;B. Schröter;M. M. García-M.;Christian Albert
利益攸关方团体作为共同生产者和受益者参与生态系统服务的共同生产。因此，利益攸关方群体对自身和彼此在生态系统服务共同生产中的作用的看法影响着在特定景观中如何提供生态系统服务。然而，只有少数研究调查了自我感知和归属利益相关者群体在这方面的作用。本文的目的是评估自我感知和归因的参与和利益相关者群体的重要性，在共同生产的生态系统服务的案例研究的拉恩河景观在德国。研究问题涉及（一）当地利益攸关方群体对自己参与生态系统服务共同生产的看法，以及（二）自我感知和归因于利益攸关方群体在生态系统服务共同生产中的重要性之间的差异和共性。我们的方法包括调查当地的利益相关者群体参与12个生态系统服务和社会网络分析，以评估有关网络结构的调查数据。我们的研究结果表明，自我感知和归因的看法不同，主要是在合作网络中的利益相关者群体的核心作用。我们进一步确定了合作网络内利益相关者群体的重要性的自我感知水平的差异，但在整体利益相关者群体网络结构的理解相似。最后，我们强调了生态系统服务治理的关键影响，包括需要解决权力不平衡问题，以及需要促进合作参与，以确保持续和公正的生态系统服务提供。
Stakeholder groups engage in ecosystem services coproduction as both coproducers and beneficiaries. Stakeholder group perceptions of their own and each other’s roles in ecosystem services coproduction therefore influence how ecosystem services are provided in a given landscape. However, only a few studies have investigated self-perceived and attributed stakeholder group roles in this context. The aim of this paper is to assess the self-perceived and attributed engagement and importance of stakeholder groups in the coproduction of ecosystem services in a case study of the Lahn River landscape in Germany. The research questions address (i) local stakeholder group perceptions of their own engagement in the coproduction of ecosystem services and (ii) differences and commonalities between self-perceived and attributed stakeholder group importance in ecosystem services coproduction. Our method involves a survey local stakeholder groups regarding involvement in the coproduction of twelve ecosystem services and social network analysis to assess the survey data concerning network structures. Our findings indicate that self-perceived and attributed perceptions differ mainly regarding the central role of stakeholder groups in collaborative networks. We further identify differences in the self-perceived levels of importance of stakeholder groups within collaborative networks but similarities in the understanding of the overall stakeholder group network structure. We conclude by highlighting key implications for ecosystem services governance, including the need to address power imbalances and the need to foster collaborative engagement to ensure sustained and just ecosystem services delivery.