Tele-health: assessment of websites on newborn hearing screening in Portuguese Language
Tele-health: assessment of websites on newborn hearing screening in Portuguese Language
复制标题
DOI：
10.1590/2317-1782/20152014169
复制
发表时间：
2015-12-01
期刊：
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Alvarenga, Kátia de Freitas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chaves, Juliana Nogueira;Libardi, Ana Lívia;Alvarenga, Kátia de Freitas
目的：验证葡萄牙语新生儿听力筛查网站的技术质量和内容。方法：根据纳入标准邀请18名听力学家参与，使用德尔菲技术选择网站描述符进行研究。后来，他们被输入谷歌趋势，以获得父母在互联网上查找有关该主题的信息时可能使用的术语。然后他们被输入b谷歌来搜索这些网站。使用以下评估工具：新生儿听力筛查主题列表、Flesch阅读轻松评分公式、健康相关网站评估Emory表格和PageRank。结果：19个网站讨论最多的话题是新生儿听力筛查的目的和益处，以及听力学诊断的过程。讨论最少的是假阴性结果、听力和语言的发展、假阳性结果、听力学、“合格”/“不合格”结果的解释、复检和方案。阅读难度普遍存在，技术质量方面被认为是与内容、受众、导航和结构相关的最佳质量。结果还显示，在巴西国家网站上没有插入链接的文化，因此它们与b谷歌的相关性很小。结论：这些网站在涉及的方面存在差异，因为需要修改内容的阅读水平和关于信息、作者和链接的准确性和及时性的技术方面的质量。
Purpose: To verify the aspects of technical quality and the content of websites on neonatal hearing screening in Portuguese. Methods: Eighteen audiologists, invited to participate according to the inclusion criteria, selected descriptors of websites for research using the Delphi technique. Later, they were fed into Google Trends to get the possible terms to be used by parents in finding information on the Internet about the subject. They were then fed into Google to search the websites. The following assessment instruments were used: list of topics on newborn hearing screening, Flesch Reading Ease Score Formula, Health-Related Web Site Evaluation Emory Form, and PageRank. Results: The most discussed topics in the 19 websites were on the objectives and benefits of neonatal hearing screening, as well as the process of audiological diagnosis. The least discussed were about the false-negative result, development of hearing and language, false-positive results, audiologic, interpretation of results "Pass"/" Do not pass", retest, and protocol. Difficult reading level was prevalent, with aspects of technical quality considered the best quality-related content, audience, navigation, and structure. The results also showed there is no culture of inserting links on Brazilian national websites, so they had little relevance on Google. Conclusions: The sites differed in the aspects addressed because there is a need to revise the reading level of the content and quality of the technical aspects regarding the accuracy and timeliness of information, authorship, and links.