Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression approach
Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression approach
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1256
复制
发表时间：
2007-10-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Verguts, Tom
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Notebaert, Wim;Verguts, Tom
一致性效应通常在不一致性试验后比一致性试验后小。一种解释是在检测到冲突后更高水平的认知控制（冲突适应;例如，M. M. Botvinick，T. S.勇敢者，D. M.巴奇角S. Carter，& J. D. Cohen，2001）。对这些结果的另一种解释是基于特征重复和/或集成效应（例如，B。霍梅尔河W.普罗克特，& K. P. Vu，2004; U.迈尔E. Awh，& P. Laurey，2003）.以前试图将特征整合与冲突适应分离的尝试集中在特征转换保持不变的数据的特定子集上（J.G.科恩斯等人，2004年）或其中一致性转换保持不变（C。Akcay & E. Hazeltine，in press），但这有一些缺点。在这篇文章中，作者提出了一个多元回归解决这个问题，并讨论了它的可能性和陷阱。
Congruency effects are typically smaller after incongruent than after congruent trials. One explanation is in terms of higher levels of cognitive control after detection of conflict (conflict adaptation; e.g., M. M. Botvinick, T. S. Braver, D. M. Barch, C. S. Carter, & J. D. Cohen, 2001). An alternative explanation for these results is based on feature repetition and/or integration effects (e.g., B. Hommel, R. W. Proctor, & K.-P. Vu, 2004; U. Mayr, E. Awh, & P. Laurey, 2003). Previous attempts to dissociate feature integration from conflict adaptation focused on a particular subset of the data in which feature transitions were held constant (J. G. Kerns et al., 2004) or in which congruency transitions were held constant (C. Akcay & E. Hazeltine, in press), but this has a number of disadvantages. In this article, the authors present a multiple regression solution for this problem and discuss its possibilities and pitfalls.