On the scope of alcohol expectancy research: remaining issues of measurement and meaning.
On the scope of alcohol expectancy research: remaining issues of measurement and meaning.
复制标题
关于酒精预期研究的范围：测量和意义的剩余问题。
DOI：
10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.147
复制
发表时间：
1991
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
Stacy,AW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Leigh,BC;Stacy,AW
Leigh（1989 d）的一篇文章检查了酒精结果预期研究的某些实质性和测量相关限制。Leigh（1989 d）从概念和方法论的角度批评了这一领域的研究，并推测了该领域研究的未来理论方向。对此，戈德曼、布朗、克里斯蒂安森和史密斯（Goldman，Brown，Christiansen，and Smith，1991）认为，利的批评在重要方面是错误的。然而，他们的一些观点是基于对利的评论的误解，他们似乎对全面测量验证和将记忆理论有意义地应用于酒精预期研究所需的条件缺乏足够的认识。尽管期望研究的局限性，令人兴奋的途径存在进一步的工作。
An article by Leigh (1989d) examined certain substantive and measurement-related limitations of research on alcohol outcome expectancies. Leigh (1989d) criticized research in this field on both conceptual and methodological grounds and speculated on future theoretical directions for research in the field. In their response, Goldman, Brown, Christiansen, and Smith (1991) contended that Leigh's critique is faulty in important respects. However, some of their points are based on misinterpretations of Leigh's comments, and they appear to have insufficient appreciation of conditions necessary for comprehensive measurement validation and for meaningful application of theories of memory to alcohol expectancy research. Despite the limitations of expectancy research, exciting avenues exist for further work.