Getting There: Barriers and Facilitators to Transportation Access in Underserved Communities

Getting There: Barriers and Facilitators to Transportation Access in Underserved Communities
复制标题

DOI:
10.1145/3233985
复制
发表时间:
2018-10-01
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Veinot, Tiffany C.
Veinot, Tiffany C.
中科院分区:
计算机科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dillahunt, Tawanna R.;Veinot, Tiffany C.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

信息和通信技术(ICT)的进步为满足交通需求提供了新的机会;然而,过去的研究表明,数百万低收入美国人并没有平等地分享这些机会。我们从四个实证研究和两个案例研究,以促进目前使用的低收入和服务不足的社区,以提高他们获得健康促进资源的居民的11个日常交通模式的描述。这些模型分为个人,私人,公共和人际类别。我们对这些模式的以下障碍和促进因素提出了见解:(1)负担能力;(2)个人能力;(3)人际信任、关怀和/或互惠;(4)对技术的信任;(5)服务可用性/资格;(6)空间和时间匹配;(7)交通方式与实际需求之间的匹配;(8)服务可靠性和质量;(9)基础设施建设。为了解决这些障碍,并在这些促进者的基础上,我们提出了六个支持性的政策和设计原则。操作这些原则,我们提出了四个新的信息和通信技术的增强模式:(1)智能jitneys;(2)广义,基于网络的模式;(3)扩大资源池;(4)运输俱乐部。这些模式侧重于社会技术与现有能力和资源的融合,这有望增加低收入社区居民获得就业、食品和医疗保健的机会。
Advances in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) offer new opportunities for addressing transportation needs; however, past research suggests that opportunities are not equally shared by millions of low-income Americans. We draw from four empirical studies and two case studies to contribute descriptions of the 11 everyday transportation models currently used by residents of low-income and underserved communities to enhance their access to health-enhancing resources. These models fell into personal, private, public, and interpersonal categories. We contribute insights regarding the following barriers and facilitators associated with these models: (1) affordability; (2) individual capabilities; (3) interpersonal trust, care and/or reciprocity; (4) trust in technology; (5) service availability/eligibility; (6) spatial and temporal matches; (7) match between transportation mode and physical needs; (8) service reliability and quality; and (9) infrastructure access. To address these barriers and build on these facilitators, we contribute six supportive policy and design principles. Operationalizing these principles, we propose four new ICT-enhanced models: (1) smart jitneys; (2) generalized, favor-based models; (3) expanded resource pooling; and (4) transportation clubs. The focus of these models on socio-technical integration with current capabilities and resources holds promise for enhancing access to jobs, food, and health care for residents of low-income communities.