The Diversity of Ethnomethodology
The Diversity of Ethnomethodology
复制标题
民族方法论的多样性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Clayman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Maynard;S. Clayman
我们的目的是回顾过去三十年来民族方法学研究的巨大范围。学者们定期发表评论文章、专著和立场文件，通常是促进或批评某个特定民族方法论子领域的工作。此外，教科书和其他民族方法论的帐户有时强加一个单一的领域，忽视了各种理论和方法链。我们试图阐明每个子领域所代表的多样性，澄清它们之间的区别，并证明它们共享的假设。我们讨论的领域包括理论，现象学，认知，会话分析，在机构设置的研究，科学研究和应用研究。虽然关于适当的主题和研究方法的辩论无疑将继续下去，但在这种辩论之下，是对现存的共同取向，在日常活动中实现有序，并致力于发现直接互动的组织特征。
Our purpose is to review the enormous range of ethnomethodological research from the past three decades. Periodically, scholars have produced review articles, monographs, and position papers that usually promote or critique the work of a particular ethnomethodological subfield. Also, textbook and other accounts of ethnomethodology sometimes impose a homogeneity on the field that neglects the various theoretical and methodological strands. We attempt to articulate the diversity each of the subfields represents, to clarify distinctions between them, and to demonstrate assumptions they share. The areas we discuss include theory, phenomenology, cognition, conversation analysis, research in institutional settings, studies of science, and applied research. While debates about proper topics and methods of research will no doubt continue, underneath such debates are a shared orientation to an extant, achieved orderliness in everyday activities and a commitment to discovering organizational features of direct inte...