Conscious Leadership for Sustainability: A study of how leaders and change agents with postconventional consciousness design and engage in complex change initiatives
Conscious Leadership for Sustainability: A study of how leaders and change agents with postconventional consciousness design and engage in complex change initiatives
复制标题
可持续发展的自觉领导力:研究具有后传统意识的领导者和变革推动者如何设计和参与复杂的变革举措
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Brown
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Brown
This document was originally written for the 2011 Ashridge International Research Conference, The sustainability challenge: Organisational change and transformational vision. Ashridge Business School, Hertfordshire, UK. It is extracted from the following dissertation: Brown, B. C. (2011) Conscious leadership for sustainability: How leaders with late-stage action logics design and engage in sustainability initiatives. Human and Organizational Systems. Santa Barbara, Fielding Graduate University. The full dissertation is available from the author by e- mailing barrett.c.brown@gmail.com. An audio interview about the research as related to conscious workplaces can be found here: http://www.wakinguptheworkplace.com/freebarrettbrowndownload/. Abstract Purpose: Document how leaders and change agents with a highly-developed meaning-making system design and engage in complex change initiatives, in the context of sustainability. Methodology/Approach: Thirty-two sustainability leaders and change agents were assessed for their meaning-making system, or action logic, using a variation of the Washington University Sentence Completion Test. Thirteen were identified as holding the three rarest and most complex action logics able to be assessed to date. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews explored how they design and engage in sustainability initiatives. Findings: These leaders appear to: (1) Design from a deep inner foundation, including grounding their work in transpersonal meaning; (2) Access non-rational ways of knowing, and use systems, complexity, and integral theories; and (3) Adaptively manage through "dialogue" with the system, three distinct roles, and developmental practices. 15 leadership competencies and developmental stage distinctions for three dimensions of leadership were identified. Research Limitations: The sample size leads to the findings being propositions that require further validation before broader generalization. Practical Implications: The results provide the most granular view to date of how individuals with complex meaning-making may think and behave with respect to complex change initiatives. This provides insight into the potential future of leadership. Social Implications: This study is an initial exploration of what leader development programs may need to focus on in order to cultivate leadership with the capacity to address very complex social, economic, and environmental challenges. Originality/Value: This paper documents 15 competencies that are: (1) largely new to the leadership literature and (2) that represent the actions and capacities of sustainability leaders and change agents who operate with very rare and complex meaning-making systems.