A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945–1963: Trachtenberg, Marc: Princeton: Princeton University Press 418 pp., Publication Date: February 1999
A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945–1963: Trachtenberg, Marc: Princeton: Princeton University Press 418 pp., Publication Date: February 1999
复制标题
《构建的和平：欧洲解决方案的形成，1945-1963 年》： Trachtenberg，马克：普林斯顿：普林斯顿大学出版社 418 页，出版日期：1999 年 2 月
DOI：
10.1080/03612759.1999.10527746
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. V. Davis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. V. Davis
在《构建的和平》一书的引言中，马克·特拉赫滕贝格提出了以下论点：“德国实力的问题是冷战的核心。”在一项全面的研究中，这位宾夕法尼亚大学的教授探索了1945-1963年间冷战早期政治的根本原因。特拉滕贝格坚持不懈地研究了大量的历史文献，他通过各种会议、条约和不成文的协议，为第一次世界大战后的欧洲奠定了基础。他认为，关键因素是德国将在战后格局中扮演的角色。特拉滕贝格认为，在紧随第11次世界大战之后的几年里，两个超级大国之间存在着关于德国的不成文契约。他认为，美国和苏联都认为分裂的德国是最可行的选择，无论官方政策如何，这项协议都是假定的。然而，在艾森豪威尔执政期间，美国的政策开始发生变化。随着北约的加强和欧洲自决问题的悬而未决，美国的行动似乎与之前的安排不符。艾森豪威尔政府提出的共享核技术的想法进一步恶化了昔日的协议，而拥有核能力的德国的建议是不可接受的
In his introduction to A Constructed Peace, Marc Trachtenberg posits the following argument:“The problem of German power lay at the heart of the cold war.” In a comprehensive examination, the University of Pennsylvania professor explores the underlying causes of early Cold War politics in the period 1945-1963. Relentlessly examining an abundance of historical documentation, Trachtenberg works his way through the multifarious conferences, treaties, and unwritten agreements that established the groundwork for post-World War I1 Europe. The critical factor, he determines, was the role Germany would have in the postwar landscape. Trachtenberg suggests that in the years immediately following World War 11, there existed an unwritten covenant between the superpowers regarding Germany. He argues that both the United States and the USSR saw a divided Germany as the most workable option, and that that agreement was assumed regardless of official policy. During the Eisenhower administration, however, US policy began to change. With the strengthening of NATO and the question of European self-determination in the balance, the US engaged in actions that seemed to be at odds with previous arrangements. The idea of sharing nuclear technology, offered by the Eisenhower administration, further deteriorated erstwhile agreements, and the suggestion of a nuclear-capable Germany was unacceptable