An examination of sample length and reliability of the Interactional Network Tool, a new measure of group interactions in acquired brain injury
An examination of sample length and reliability of the Interactional Network Tool, a new measure of group interactions in acquired brain injury
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/02687038.2022.2118517
复制
发表时间:
2022-09
期刊:
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
S. Howell;S. Beeke;Emma Louise Sinnott;R. Varley;T. Pring
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Howell;S. Beeke;Emma Louise Sinnott;R. Varley;T. Pring
ABSTRACT Background Conversation is challenging to measure. Quantitative and qualitative measures need to be sensitive to the conversation context, the purpose and the variable contributions of participants in order to capture meaningful change. Measurements also need to be consistent across independent raters. The reliability of global observational rating scales across differing sample lengths has previously been investigated. An investigation into the effects of sample length on inter-rater reliability using a behavioural frequency measure is a new field of research. Aims This study reports on the inter-rater reliability of the Interactional Network Tool (INT), a behavioural coding system for use with group interaction data. It examines the effects of sample length on reliability using a refined coding system designed to improve the speed and efficiency of use in clinical settings. Methods Fourteen video samples of group interactions for people with acquired brain injury were prepared for analysis. Two raters independently coded the films using the INT coding system. Individual code reliability was calculated using intra-class correlations (ICCs). Codes were combined to form a new coding structure. Reliability of the new codes was calculated using intra-class correlations across four sample lengths (5,10,15 and 20 minutes). A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare the means of the four sample lengths. Outcomes and Results Acceptable inter-rater reliability was achieved using the refined INT coding system. There was no difference between the four sample lengths. Conclusions These findings indicate that trained clinicians using the INT in clinical practice can achieve a reliable measure of participation in a group interaction from short samples. Validation with other clinical groups is now indicated.