DRUG CHOICE AS A SELF-HANDICAPPING STRATEGY IN RESPONSE TO NONCONTINGENT SUCCESS
DRUG CHOICE AS A SELF-HANDICAPPING STRATEGY IN RESPONSE TO NONCONTINGENT SUCCESS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.405
复制
发表时间：
1978-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
JONES, EE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BERGLAS, S;JONES, EE
在两个实验中，大学生被要求在一种据称会干扰表现的药物和一种据称会提高表现的药物之间做出选择。这一选择是实验的主要依赖措施。药物的选择干预之间的工作解决或不解决的问题，并承诺重新测试类似的问题。在实验I中，68名男性和43名女性，所有的学生在他们最初的问题解决尝试后都收到了成功的反馈，从而创造了一种情况，在这种情况下，成功似乎是偶然的（与表现无关），而在这种情况下，成功似乎取决于适当的知识。在非偶然成功条件下，只有男性更喜欢性能抑制药物，大概是因为他们希望在重新测试时将可能的失败外化。然而，预测的效果并不适用于女性学生。实验二，与87 SS，复制了独特的偏好后，男性非偶然的成功，并显示成功的反馈至关重要。(18参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
In 2 experiments, college student Ss were instructed to choose between a drug that allegedly interfered with performance and a drug that allegedly enhanced performance. This choice was the main dependent measure of the experiment. The drug choice intervened between work on soluble or insoluble problems and a promised retest on similar problems. In Exp I with 68 males and 43 females, all Ss received success feedback after their initial problem-solving attempts, thus creating one condition in which the success appeared to be accidental (noncontingent on performance) and one in which the success appeared to be contingent on appropriate knowledge. Males in the noncontingent-success condition were alone in preferring the performance-inhibiting drug, presumably because they wished to externalize probable failure on the retest. The predicted effect, however, did not hold for female Ss. Exp II, with 87 Ss, replicated the unique preference shown by males after noncontingent success and showed the critical importance of success feedback.(18 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)