Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Mechanical Mitral Valve: Long-Term Outcome of Single Procedure of Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation with or without Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Ablation

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Mechanical Mitral Valve: Long-Term Outcome of Single Procedure of Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation with or without Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Ablation
复制标题

机械二尖瓣患者心房颤动的导管消融:肺静脉窦隔离单次手术联合或不联合非肺静脉触发消融的长期结果。

DOI:
10.1111/jce.12433
复制
发表时间:
2014-08-01
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Natale, Andrea
Natale, Andrea
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bai, Rong;Di Biase, Luigi;Natale, Andrea

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

MMV患者AF消融的长期结局。简介:目前尚不清楚在接受AF消融的机械二尖瓣(MMV)患者中,延长肺静脉窦隔离(PVAI)+非肺静脉(非PV)触发消除是否比单独PVAI更能预防心律失常复发。本研究比较了两种消融策略--单纯PVAI与扩大PVAI加非PV触发消除--治疗MMV患者AF的疗效和长期结局。方法和结果:109例连续的MMV AF患者分为2组:第1组(N = 45)进行标准PVAI;在第2组(N = 64)中,PVAI扩展至LA后壁、LA间隔和CS;所有非PV触发因素均被消除。随访3年。第12个月时,第1组7例(15.6%)和第2组39例(60.9%)患者无心律失常(对数秩P < 0.001)。第1组4例患者(8.9%; 3例AT和1例AF)和第2组12例患者(18.8%; 9例AT和3例AFL)出现极晚期复发。在36 +/- 7个月随访时,单次手术后的累积复发率为42/45第1组为93.3%,第6组为37/64第2组(57.8%)(对数秩P < 0.001)。与单独的标准PVAI相比,在接受AF消融的MMV患者中,包括延长PVAI和消除非PV触发因素的策略与更高的12个月和长期无房颤生存率相关。极晚期复发可能发生在初次手术后数年,局灶性房性心动过速是最常见的复发性心律失常类型。
Long-Term Outcome of AF Ablation in MMV Patients. Introduction: It is unclear whether extended pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) plus nonpulmonary vein (non-PV) trigger elimination prevents more arrhythmia recurrence than PVAI alone in patients with mechanical mitral valve (MMV) undergoing AF ablation. This study compared the efficacy and long-term outcome of 2 ablation strategies-PVAI alone versus extended PVAI plus non-PV trigger elimination-for the treatment of AF in patients with MMV.Methods and Results: One hundred and nine consecutive AF patients with MMV were divided into 2 groups: standard PVAI was performed in group 1 (N = 45); in group 2 (N = 64) PVAI was extended to the LA posterior wall, LA septum, and CS; and all non-PV triggers were eliminated. Patients were followed up for 3 years. At the 12th month, 7 (15.6%) patients in group 1, and 39 (60.9%) patients in group 2 were arrhythmia free (log-rank P < 0.001). Four patients (8.9%; 3 cases of AT and 1 case of AF) from group 1, and 12 patients (18.8%; 9 cases of AT, and 3 cases of AFL) from group 2 experienced very late recurrence. At 36 +/- 7 months follow-up, the cumulative recurrence after a single procedure was 42/45 (93.3%) in group 1, and 37/64 (57.8%) in group 2 (log-rank P < 0.001).Conclusion: Compared with the standard PVAI alone, a strategy including extended PVAI and non-PV trigger elimination is associated with a higher 12-month and long-term arrhythmia-free survival in patients with MMV undergoing AF ablation. Very late recurrence may occur years after the initial procedure with focal AT as the most common type of recurrent arrhythmia.