The effectiveness of management interventions used to control ragwort species.

The effectiveness of management interventions used to control ragwort species.
复制标题

用于控制狗舌草物种的管理干预措施的有效性。

DOI:
10.1007/s00267-006-0039-7
复制
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Roberts PD
Roberts PD
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Roberts PD

文献摘要

相似文献

豚草(Senecio jacobaea和S.水生物(aquaticus)对农业收入造成重大损失,并在欧洲、北美和澳大拉西亚的部分地区引起牲畜发病。英国立法的引入。而澳大利亚则表示,如果这种植物蔓延到邻近的土地,土地所有者可能会被起诉,这导致了试图控制这些物种的活动的增加。常用的干预措施包括天敌、施用除草剂、人工和机械清除。通过使用明确的系统方法,包括全面的搜索和详细的纳入标准,从初级研究的数据进行整理,为每种类型的干预。荟萃分析表明,2,4-D,Asulam,二氯吡啶酸和MCPA在降低豚草密度方面是有效的。然而,当分析数据集对单个物种的有效性时,2,4-D和MCPA仅对S有效。jacobaea,而Asulam仅对S.水刺长跗螨(Longitarsus jacobaeae)和水刺长跗螨L. jacobaeae和Tyria jacobaeae似乎具有降低S. jacobaeadensities。仅适用于T. jacobaeae似乎没有显着降低S。jacobaeadensities,但确实减少了每株植物头状花序的数量、每头状花序的种子、种子的活力和植物的干重。没有足够的实验证据来评估其他干预措施,如手动或机械移除。建议对这些类型的干预措施进行进一步研究,并更详细地报告场地特征和实验设计,以便对每种干预措施进行全面调查,解释其有效性变化的可能原因。
Ragwort (Senecio jacobaeaandS. aquaticus) causes major losses to agricultural revenue and induces livestock morbidity throughout parts of Europe, North America, and Australasia. The introduction of legislation in the U.K. and Australia has meant that landowners can be prosecuted if the plant spreads to adjacent land, which has led to an increase in activities attempting to control these species. Commonly used interventions include natural enemies, herbicide applications, manual and mechanical removal. Through the use of explicit systematic methodology involving comprehensive searches and detailed inclusion criteria, data from primary research are collated for each type of intervention. Meta-analyses show that 2,4-D, Asulam, Clopyralid, and MCPA are effective at reducing ragwort densities. However, when the datasets were analysed for their effectiveness against individual species, 2,4-D and MCPA were only effective againstS. jacobaea, while Asulam was only effective againstS. aquaticus.Natural enemiesLongitarsus jacobaeaeand a combination ofL. jacobaeaeandTyria jacobaeaeappear to have the potential to reduceS. jacobaeadensities. Only applyingT. jacobaeaedoes not appear to significantly reduceS. jacobaeadensities, but does reduce the number of capitula per plant, seeds per capitula, viability of seeds, and dry weight of the plants. There is insufficient experimental evidence available to assess other interventions such as manual or mechanical removal. Further research into these types of interventions is recommended, as well as more detailed reporting of site characteristics and experimental design to allow full investigation of each intervention to explain possible reasons for variations in their effectiveness.