Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' averaged evaluations of "facial attractiveness'' from end-of-treatment facial photographs
Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' averaged evaluations of "facial attractiveness'' from end-of-treatment facial photographs
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.039
复制
发表时间：
2009-05-01
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Baumrind, Sheldon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Liu, Yan;Korn, Edward L.;Baumrind, Sheldon
简介：本研究继续评估25名中国和20名美国正畸医生对随机抽样的中国和白色正畸患者治疗结束照片的面部吸引力排名的一致性和不一致性。本文的主要目的是（1）测量美国和中国儿科医生平均排名之间的总体一致性模式，以及（2）测量美国和中国儿科医生对每例患者的排名之间的一致性强度。研究方法：每位法官独立地对43名美国患者和48名中国患者的标准临床侧貌、正面和正面微笑照片进行排名。对于每名患者，根据每组法官的回答计算单独的平均等级。皮尔森相关系数的平均等级的2组法官被用来衡量他们的整体协议。使用配对和非配对t检验来测量2组法官对每例患者的一致性。结果：中美两国法官的平均排名总体一致性很高。对于美国患者，中国和美国法官平均值之间的相关性为r = 0.92，P
Introduction: This study continues our assessment of agreement and disagreement among 25 Chinese and 20 US orthodontists in the ranking for facial attractiveness of end-of-treatment photographs of randomly sampled growing Chinese and white orthodontic patients. The main aims of this article were to (1) measure the overall pattern of agreement between the mean rankings of US and Chinese orthodontists, and (2) measure the strength of agreement between the rankings of the US and Chinese orthodontists for each patient. Methods: Each judge independently ranked standard clinical sets of profile, frontal, and frontal-smiling photographs of 43 US patients and 48 Chinese patients. For each patient, a separate mean rank was computed from the responses of each group of judges. Pearson correlations between the mean ranks of the 2 groups of judges were used to measure their overall agreement. Paired and unpaired t tests were used to measure the agreement between the judges of the 2 groups for each patient. Results: The overall agreement between the mean rankings of the US and Chinese judges was very high. For the US patients, the correlation between the Chinese and US judges means was r = 0.92, P