Relocating the political in education: why we need to revisit the marketisation of education in the contemporary political climate

Relocating the political in education: why we need to revisit the marketisation of education in the contemporary political climate
复制标题

重新定位教育中的政治:为什么我们需要在当代政治气候下重新审视教育的市场化

DOI:
10.1080/21582041.2022.2147987
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Arora-Kukreja R
Arora-Kukreja R
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Arora-Kukreja R

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文采用政治学和政治人类学的工具,重新评估主流的问责制和市场化的话语,继续塑造整个发展中国家的教育政策。本文在对促进教育准市场化和赋予家长话语权和选择权的研究进行探讨后,采用委托代理理论,社会主导理论和日常概念认为,这种以社区为中心的政策--最初是为了抵消国家对教育的掠夺--事实上可能导致教育景观变得本质上政治化,并反映国家政治话语,尽管不是我们传统上认为的方式。它认为,父母不能再被视为被动的,非政治性的代理人在教育话语。相反,公民的利益不断发生冲突,而在一个旨在回应更占主导地位的家长利益的市场化制度中,学校可能成为群体间的相互冲突和相互竞争的政治信仰被具体化的场所。这篇文章邀请我们修改我们目前对教育和政治的理解,并提出问题:我们将什么或谁定义为政治,为什么这变得越来越重要?
This article adopts tools from political science and political anthropology to re-evaluate the prevailing discourses of accountability and marketisation that continue to shape education policies across the developing world. Following an exploration of studies promoting the quasi-marketisation of education and reforms that empower parents to exercise their voice and choice, this paper adopts principal–agent theory, social dominance theory and concept of the everyday to argue that such community-centric policies – which were initially devised to offset the capture of education by the state – may de facto lead to the education landscape becoming intrinsically politicised and reflective of national political discourses, albeit not in the way we conventionally believe. It argues that parents can no longer be regarded as passive, apolitical agents in education discourse. Rather, citizens’ interests are continually in conflict, and in a marketised system designed to respond to the interests of more dominant parents, schools may become sites in which inter-group contestations and competing political beliefs are reified. This article invites us to revise our current understanding of education and politics, and question: What – or whom – do we define as political, and why is this becoming increasingly important?
“日常”的概念:短暂的政治和丰富的生活
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
影响因子: 2
作者:
X. Guillaume;J. Huysmans
通讯作者: J. Huysmans
全球政治的日常空间:工作、休闲、家庭
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Davies;M. Niemann
通讯作者: M. Niemann
2017年世界发展报告:世界银行治理思维的演变
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Lateef
通讯作者: S. Lateef
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Patrick A. Denice;B. Gross
通讯作者: B. Gross
民主、可见性和公共物品供应
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Mani;S. Mukand
通讯作者: S. Mukand