Word order type and syntactic structure

Word order type and syntactic structure
复制标题

词序类型和句法结构

DOI:
10.1075/livy.1.04jul
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Marit Julien
Marit Julien
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Marit Julien

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文的中心论点是,一种相同词序类型的语言不一定具有相同的 IP 语法。例如,在动词结尾语言中,可以区分两种截然不同的句法类型。大多数动词结尾语言在 IP 中都是中心词结尾,从某种意义上说,IP 域中的每个投影在表面顺序中都有其左侧的补语。此处将其视为补集重复移动到最接近的规格的结果。在其他动词结尾语言中,表面顺序只是参数移动的结果。知识产权方面的预测仍然有其正确的补充。进一步建议,动词开头语言的类别可以沿着类似的思路分为两类。最后,主语前面不存在屈折标记的SVO语言被认为支持这样的观点:在IP中缺乏强特征的情况下,IP中中心词的c(补语)特征起作用,从而产生中心词最终IP结构。
The central claim of this paper is that languages of one and the same word order type do not necessarily have the same IP syntax. For example, among verb-final languages two rather different syntactic types can be distinguished. The majority of verb-final languages are head-final in IP, in the sense that every projection in the IP domain has its complement to its left in the surface order. This is seen here as the result of repeated movement of complement to the nearest Spec. In other verb-final languages, the surface order is simply a result of argument movement. The projections in IP still have their complements to their right. It is further suggested that the class of verb-initial languages may be divided in two along similar lines. Finally, the non-existence of SVO languages with inflectional markers in front of the subject is taken as support for the idea that in the absence of strong features in IP, the c(omplement)-features of the heads in IP take effect, thereby yielding head-final IP structure.