Funding, financing and governing urban infrastructures
Funding, financing and governing urban infrastructures
复制标题
城市基础设施的融资、融资和管理
DOI：
10.1177/0042098018824014
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
A. Pike
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. O'brien;P. O’Neill;A. Pike
本特刊旨在进一步理解和解释在其参与当代金融化过程中城市基础设施的融资，融资和管理。它借鉴了欧洲、北美、非洲和亚洲国际案例的经验材料，确定了推进这一领域工作的关键问题。这些主题涉及：金融化对改变城市基础设施的定义和概念的影响;对金融化采取更面向行动者和更有基础的方法的价值;进一步承认国家和地方政府是金融化关系、进程和做法的对象和代理人的重要性;基础设施决策和治理的新兴非正式化的实质和后果;以及金融化对城市基础设施供应不断变化和不均衡的影响。其论点是，首先，基础设施的资金，融资和管理是不可或缺的，以解释社会和空间不平衡的基础设施提供及其城市发展的影响;第二，城市基础设施与当代金融化的参与已成为这些帐户的中心。确定了未来的研究途径。这些措施包括：明确基础设施资产如何产生收入;具体说明金融化与其他过程的关系，如“资产化”，“市场化”和私有化;扩大目前研究的地理和比较范围;详细说明谈判和适应基础设施金融化的监管空间;以及审查权力下放和资源在城市基础设施融资方面的作用，并探索其替代方案。
This Special Issue aims to further understanding and explanation of the funding, financing and governing of urban infrastructure amidst its engagements with contemporary financialisation. Drawing upon empirical material from international cases from Europe, North America, Africa and Asia, it identifies critical issues to advance work in this area. These themes concern: the impacts of financialisation upon shifting the definitions and conceptualisations of urban infrastructure; the worth of adopting more actor-oriented and grounded approaches to financialisation; the importance of affording greater recognition to national and local states as the objects and agents of financialising relations, processes and practices; the substance and ramifications of the emergent informalisation of infrastructure policy-making and governance; and, the implications of financialisation for the evolving and uneven landscapes of urban infrastructure provision. The arguments are, first, that how infrastructure is funded, financed and governed is integral to explaining socially and spatially uneven infrastructural provision and its urban development ramifications; and second, the engagements of urban infrastructure with contemporary financialisation have become central in such accounts. Future research avenues are identified. These comprise: identifying exactly how revenues are generated from infrastructure assets; specifying the relations of financialisation with other processes such as ‘assetisation’, ‘marketisation’ and privatisation; extending the geographical and comparative reach of current studies; elaborating the spaces of regulation in negotiating and accommodating infrastructure financialisation; and, scrutinising the roles of decentralised powers and resources in financialising urban infrastructure and exploring its alternatives.
智能电网作为公共资源：探索基础设施金融化的替代方案
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Hall S
通讯作者：
Hall S