Evaluation of adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: Results of randomized global phase III study 305

Evaluation of adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: Results of randomized global phase III study 305
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03638.x
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Laurenza, Antonio
Laurenza, Antonio
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
French, Jacqueline A.;Krauss, Gregory L.;Laurenza, Antonio

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:评估perampanel 8 mg和12 mg每日一次与13种获批抗癫痫药物(AED)联合给药治疗不受控制的部分性癫痫发作患者的疗效和安全性。研究方法:研究305是一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,受试者年龄≥ 12岁,既往接受过至少2种AED治疗但癫痫持续发作,目前正在接受13种AED治疗。随机分配至每日一次口服perampanel 8或12 mg或安慰剂组。患者进入19周双盲治疗期,包括6周滴定期,每周2 mg剂量增量,随后为13周维持期。主要疗效终点为应答率(治疗期间每28天癫痫发作频率相对于基线降低≥ 50%的患者比例)和每28天癫痫发作频率相对于perampanel治疗前基线的百分比变化。次要终点是复杂部分性发作加继发性全身性发作频率的百分比变化。在整个研究期间监测不良事件(AE)。主要结果:386例患者被随机分组并接受研究药物治疗。其中,321名患者完成了研究。安慰剂组、perampanel 8 mg组和perampanel 12 mg组的50%应答率(意向治疗分析)分别为14.7%、33.3%和33.9%,perampanel 8 mg组(p = 0.002)和12 mg组(p < 0.001)均较安慰剂组显著改善。安慰剂组、8 mg组和12 mg组每28天癫痫发作频率较基线的中位百分比变化(意向治疗分析)分别为-9.7%、-30.5%和-17.6%,与安慰剂组相比,8 mg组(p < 0.001)和12 mg组(p = 0.011)均显著降低。对于复杂部分性癫痫发作加上继发全身性部分性癫痫发作,频率的中位百分比变化为-32.7%(8 mg)、-21.9(12 mg)和-8.1%(安慰剂),8 mg(p < 0.001)和12 mg(p = 0.005)均显著降低。最常见的(任何治疗组≥ 10%的患者发生)治疗后出现的AE为头晕、嗜睡、疲乏和头痛,除头痛外,所有AE均存在明显的剂量效应。重要性:这项III期试验证明,每日一次perampanel 8 mg和12 mg连续治疗可有效改善12岁及以上难治性部分性癫痫发作患者的癫痫控制。这些研究结果还表明,在本研究中,8 mg和12 mg每日一次给药是安全的,耐受性可接受。Perampanel在该人群中表现出有利的风险/获益比。
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily doses of perampanel 8 and 12 mg when added to 13 concomitantly administered, approved antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Methods: Study 305 was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients aged 12 years and older with ongoing seizures despite prior therapy with at least two AEDs, and currently receiving 13 AEDs. Equal randomization to once-daily oral perampanel 8 or 12 mg, or placebo was performed. Patients entered a 19-week double-blind treatment phase comprising a 6-week titration period, with weekly 2-mg dose increments, followed by a 13-week maintenance period. Primary efficacy end points were the responder rate (proportion of patients who had a =50% reduction in seizure frequency during treatment per 28 days relative to baseline), and the percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days relative to pre-perampanel baseline. A secondary end point was percent change in the frequency of complex partial plus secondarily generalized seizures. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Key Findings: Three hundred eighty-six patients were randomized and treated with study medication. Of these, 321 patients completed the study. The 50% responder rates (intent-to-treat analysis) were 14.7%, 33.3%, and 33.9%, respectively, for placebo, perampanel 8 mg, and perampanel 12 mg, with significant improvements over placebo for both perampanel 8 mg (p = 0.002) and 12 mg (p < 0.001). The median percent change from baseline in seizure frequency per 28 days (intent-to-treat analysis) was -9.7%, -30.5%, and -17.6% for placebo, 8 mg, and 12 mg, respectively, with significant reductions compared with placebo for both 8 mg (p < 0.001) and 12 mg (p = 0.011). For complex partial seizures plus partial seizures that secondarily generalized, the median percent change in frequency was -32.7% (8 mg), -21.9 (12 mg), and -8.1% (placebo), with significant reductions for both 8 mg (p < 0.001) and 12 mg (p = 0.005). The most frequent (occurring in =10% of patients in any treatment group) treatment-emergent AEs were dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, and headache, with an apparent dose effect suggested for all except headache. Significance: This phase III trial demonstrated that adjunctive treatment with once-daily perampanel at 8 mg and 12 mg was effective in improving seizure control in patients 12 years and older with refractory partial-onset seizures. These study results also demonstrated that once-daily doses of 8 mg and 12 mg were safe and acceptably tolerated in this study. Perampanel demonstrated a favorable risk/benefit ratio in this population.