DRIFT, ADMIXTURE, AND SELECTION IN HUMAN-EVOLUTION - A STUDY WITH DNA POLYMORPHISMS

DRIFT, ADMIXTURE, AND SELECTION IN HUMAN-EVOLUTION - A STUDY WITH DNA POLYMORPHISMS
复制标题

DOI:
10.1073/pnas.88.3.839
复制
发表时间:
1991-02-01
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
CAVALLISFORZA, LL
CAVALLISFORZA, LL
中科院分区:
综合性期刊1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
BOWCOCK, AM;KIDD, JR;CAVALLISFORZA, LL

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对一个物种内种群进行进化分析的准确性需要对大量属于许多基因座的基因多态性进行检测。我们在此报告了基于在来自四大洲的五个种群中检测的100种DNA多态性对人类分化的一次重建。这些结果与基于其他类别的遗传标记的早期结论相符,但揭示出欧洲人不符合具有相等进化速率的独立进化种群的简单模型。涉及早期混合的进化模型与数据相符。考虑到这样一个模型,我们通过模拟检验了仅随机遗传漂变是否可以解释种群间和基因间基因频率的变异。为每种多态性计算了一种种群间变异的度量,并将其在100种多态性中的分布与仅漂变假设所预期的分布进行了比较。至少三分之二的多态性似乎是选择性中性的,但在观测到的变异度量分布的两端存在显著偏差:变异低的多态性略有过量,变异高的多态性过量更多。这表明少数DNA多态性受自然选择影响,很少是杂种优势的,更多是分裂性的,而大多数是选择性中性的。
Accuracy of evolutionary analysis of populations within a species requires the testing of a large number of genetic polymorphisms belonging to many loci. We report here a reconstruction of human differentiation based on 100 DNA polymorphisms tested in five populations from four continents. The results agree with earlier conclusions based on other classes of genetic markers but reveal that Europeans do not fit a simple model of independently evolving populations with equal evolutionary rates. Evolutionary models involving early admixture are compatible with the data. Taking one such model into account, we examined through simulation whether random genetic drift alone might explain the variation among gene frequencies across populations and genes. A measure of variation among populations was calculated for each polymorphism, and its distribution for the 100 polymorphisms was compared with that expected for a drift-only hypothesis. At least two-thirds of the polymorphisms appear to be selectively neutral, but there are significant deviations at the two ends of the observed distribution of the measure of variation: a slight excess of polymorphisms with low variation and a greater excess with high variation. This indicates that a few DNA polymorphisms are affected by natural selection, rarely heterotic, and more often disruptive, while most are selectively neutral.