A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory
A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory
复制标题
工程设计中创造性方法的理论分析：在C-K理论中铸造和改进ASIT
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Subrahmanian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y. Reich;A. Hatchuel;O. Shai;E. Subrahmanian
支持创造力的方法多种多样。理解这些方法，包括一种方法相对于另一种方法的比较优势，对于创新设计的研究和实践都具有重要意义。本文论证了借助理论进行方法分析的好处。这种方法为分析不同的方法提供了明确的基础，而这些方法又可以相互比较。这种方法是通过先进的系统性创造性思维（ASIT）的批判性分析证明-一种实用的方法-使用C-K理论，设计理论，提供了一个正式的创造性思维模型。分析揭示了ASIT运作中的一个悖论：在“呆在盒子里”的同时保持创造性。在确认ASIT可以被视为一些C-K结构的实现的同时，分析通过解释如何使用ASIT创建创造性的解决方案来进一步解决这个悖论。最后，分析还暴露了ASIT的能力和局限性，以及它的改进方向，通过扩展ASIT算子，并以线性的方式应用它们。
Approaches to supporting creativity are diverse and numerous. Making sense of these methods, including the comparative benefits of one approach over another is highly significant to both research and practice of creative design. This paper demonstrates the benefit of conducting analyses of methods with the aid of a theory. Such an approach provides a clear basis for analysing different methods that could in turn be compared with each other. This approach is demonstrated through the critical analysis of advanced systematic inventive thinking (ASIT) – a practical method – using the C–K theory, a design theory that offers a formal model of creative thinking. The analysis uncovers a paradox in ASIT operation: being creative while ‘staying in the box’. While confirming that ASIT could be perceived as an implementation of some of the C–K constructs, the analysis further resolves the paradox by explaining how creative solutions could be created with ASIT. Finally, the analysis also exposes the capabilities and limitations of ASIT as well as its directions of improvement by extending ASIT operators and applying them in a linear manner.