Some observations on factivity
Some observations on factivity
复制标题
关于事实的一些观察
DOI：
10.1080/08351817109370248
复制
发表时间：
1971
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
L. Karttunen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Karttunen
人们普遍认为，事实动词涉及预设，尽管似乎没有人完全理解我们所说的“预设”是什么意思。根据Kiparsky（1968）提出的标准分析，一个带有事实谓语的句子被认为是以其补语的真值为前提的。这适用于肯定和否定断言，也适用于疑问句和祈使句。例如，（2）中的所有例子都以（3）为前提。（2）（a）比尔遗憾希拉不再年轻（B）比尔不遗憾希拉不再年轻。(c)比尔对希拉不再年轻感到遗憾吗？
With Sentential Objects forget (that) regret resent realize make clear find out discover see notice There is a general agreement that factive verbs involve presuppositions, although it seems that nobody quite understands what we mean by the term'presupposition'. According to the standard analysis, which was first presented by Paul and Carol Kiparsky (1968), a sentence with a factive predicate is said to presuppose the truth of its complement sentence. This goes for affirmative and negative assertions as well as for questions and imperatives. For instance, all the examples in (2) presuppose (3).(2)(a) Bill regrets that Sheila is no longer young (b) Bill doesn't regret that Sheila is no longer young.(c) Does Bill regret that Sheila is no longer young?