Context of Thought and Context of Utterance: A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present
Context of Thought and Context of Utterance: A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present
复制标题
思想语境和话语语境：关于自由间接话语和历史现状的注记
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Schlenker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Schlenker
基于对《自由间接语篇》和《历史现在时》中叙述的分析，我认为（特别是在Banfield， 1982）和Doron， 1991)，言语语境的语法概念应该被划分为思想语境和话语语境。时态和人称取决于话语的语境，而所有其他指示语（包括here， now和指示语）都是根据思想语境来评估的。自由间接语篇和历史现在时被分析为特殊的组合可能性，当两种上下文是不同的，而其中一种恰好与句子表达的物理点相同。
: Based on the analysis of narrations in Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present, I argue (building in particular on (Banfield, 1982) and (Doron, 1991)) that the grammatical notion of context of speech should be ramified into a Context of Thought and a Context of Utterance. Tense and person depend on the Context of Utterance, while all other indexicals (including here, now and the demonstratives) are evaluated with respect to the Context of Thought. Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present are analyzed as special combinatorial possibilities that arise when the two contexts are distinct, and exactly one of them is presented as identical to the physical point at which the sentence is articulated.