RECOGNITION OF MULTIPLE-ITEM PROBES
RECOGNITION OF MULTIPLE-ITEM PROBES
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/bf03197727
复制
发表时间：
1987-09-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
SHIFFRIN, RM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
CLARK, SE;SHIFFRIN, RM
在本研究中，我们对比了熟悉度或强度是识别判断的唯一基础的模型（例如，Gillund和Shiffrin，1984年）与模型结合检索特定的信息在一个回忆样的过程（例如，Humphreys，1976，1978; Humphreys and Bain，1984）.我们还研究了一个项目的强度部分取决于学习和测试中语言编码上下文之间的匹配的可能性。在两个实验中，研究项目以三个一组呈现。在实验1识别测试与所有可能的组合的一个，两个或三个项目的目标和干扰;此外，三个不同的决策标准，采用不同的列表。实验2包括线索识别等测试条件。当更多的线索被添加到探针中时，识别性能并没有增加，这一发现与汉弗莱斯的模型和其他类型的模型不一致。这两项研究都很好地符合一个版本的搜索联想记忆模型的识别（Gillund和Shiffrin，1984）。
In the present study, we contrasted models in which familiarity or strength is the sole basis for recognition judgments (e.g., Gillund and Shiffrin, 1984) with models incorporating retrieval of specific information in a recall-like process (e.g., Humphreys, 1976, 1978; Humphreys and Bain, 1984). We also examined the possibility that an item''s strength" is determined in part by the match between the verbal encoding contexts at study and at test. In two experiments, study items were presented in triplets. In Experiment 1 recognition was tested with all possible combinations of one-, two-, or three-item targets and distractors; in addition, three different decision criteria were employed in different lists. Experiment 2 included cued recognition among other test conditions. Recognition performance did not increase as more cues were added to the probe, a finding that is inconsistent with Humphreys''s model and other models of that type. Both studies were well fit by a version of the Search of Associative Memory model for recognition (Gillund and Shiffrin, 1984).