Comparing fertility preservation resources and policies between NCCN member and non-member institutions
Comparing fertility preservation resources and policies between NCCN member and non-member institutions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00520-018-4475-8
复制
发表时间：
2019-06-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Vadaparampil, Susan T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bowman-Curci, Meghan;Quinn, Gwendolyn P.;Vadaparampil, Susan T.
目的国家综合癌症网络 (NCCN) 制定了指导方针，以促进针对青少年和年轻成年患者的生育力保留 (FP) 讨论和转诊的实施。我们根据 NCCN 会员资格，评估了参加癌症医疗保健生殖健康护士教育 (ENRICH) 培训计划的学习者之间工作场所 FP 资源和转诊政策的可用性是否存在差异。方法学习者完成了基线申请，包括人口统计信息以及 FP 资源和转诊政策的可用性。学习者被分为 NCCN 会员或非会员，卡方检验比较了两组之间的资源。结果来自 NCCN 机构的学习者报告了既定 FP 转介指南的最高比率 (p
PurposeThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) created guidelines to facilitate implementation of fertility preservation (FP) discussions and referrals for adolescent and young adult patients. We assessed if availability of workplace FP resources and referral policies differed among learners in the Educating Nurses about Reproductive Health in Cancer Healthcare (ENRICH) training program based on NCCN membership.MethodsLearners completed a baseline application, including demographic information and the availability of FP resources and referral policies. Learners were categorized as either NCCN members or non-members and chi-square tests compared resources between the two groups.ResultsLearners from NCCN institutions reported the highest rates of established FP referral guidelines (p