The self-help housing in Indonesia: The only option for the poor?
The self-help housing in Indonesia: The only option for the poor?
复制标题
印度尼西亚的自助住房：穷人的唯一选择？
DOI：
10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.007
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
6.8
通讯作者：
Andrea Peresthu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Tunas;Andrea Peresthu
印度尼西亚的自助住房与甘榜密切相关。大部分是自发和自行建造的城市住区，有时住房质量较低，而且始终没有保有权保障。在这些低成本的自我管理住宅区，居民主要依靠自己的努力和社交网络。所有已知的城市下层阶级生存策略都在这里得到实践。由于大规模的甘榜改善计划（“KIP”），许多甘榜的物质得到了改善（特别是在基础设施方面），但家居改善从来都不是主要问题。其他甘榜也是非正式和非法的，甚至由于位置选择不当而变得危险（“处于危险中”的位置）。然而，在一个廉价住房计划远远不够的国家，甘榜是许多城市低收入家庭的实质性和实用的住所。本文首先探讨了导致甘榜形成的因素，并展示了甘榜如何受益于政府住房政策或受到政府住房政策的不利影响。最后提出了长期战略解决方案的建议和建议。
Self-help housing in Indonesia is related strongly to the kampong; being mostly a self-initiated and self-constructed urban settlement, with sometimes low housing qualities and always no security of tenure. In these low-cost self-management residential areas, the residents (must) rely mainly on their own efforts and their social networks. All known survival strategies of the urban underclass are practised here. Many kampongs were improved physically (especially with respect to their infrastructure) as a consequence of the huge Kampong Improvements Programmes (‘KIPs’), but home improvement was never a main issue. Other kampongs are informal and illegal as well, or even dangerous because of the badly chosen locations (locations ‘at risk’). Nevertheless, in a country where low-cost housing programmes are far from adequate, the kampongs are substantial and practical accommodation of the many urban low-income families. This paper explores the factors that led to the formation of kampongs in the first place and shows how kampongs benefit from or are adversely affected by the government housing policies. It ends with recommendations and suggestions for long-term strategic solutions.