Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement
Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement
复制标题
24 个工业民主国家的法团主义：意义与衡量
DOI：
10.1111/1475-6765.00467
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
5.3
通讯作者：
Alan. Siaroff
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alan. Siaroff
在工业民主国家中，“社团主义”概念的持续使用已经扩展到包括重叠但仍然不同的现实，这反过来又经常产生不同的社团主义经济“清单”。因此，本文的分析旨在理清社团主义的概念，并提出一个替代概念。它根据23个不同的学术分析给出的社团主义分数，对24个长期工业民主国家进行了比较分类。对某些重要但有问题的案例（如日本）的评分存在分歧，这可以通过注意该术语的不同侧重点来解释。然后，我提出了另一种选择，更集中的经济一体化总结性衡量标准，它显然是线性的，没有“问题案例”。从20世纪60年代末到90年代中期，对经济一体化给出了四个时间段的精确分数。我们将看到，工业民主国家一直被分为一体化和非一体化（或“多元化”）经济。
The ongoing use of the concept of ‘corporatism’ in industrial democracies has been stretched to include overlapping but still distinctive realities, which in turn often produce different ‘lists’ of corporatist economies. Consequently, this analysis sets out to disentangle the concept of corporatism and to suggest a replacement. It includes a comparative classification of 24 long-term industrial democracies in terms of the corporatism scores given by 23 different scholarly analyses. The divisions in scoring certain important but problematic cases (such as Japan) can be explained by noting differing emphases in the term. I then propose an alternative, more focused summary measure of economic integration which is clearly linear and which has no ‘problem cases’. Precise scores on economic integration are given for four time periods from the late 1960s through the mid-1990s. It will be seen that the industrial democracies have always been dichotomised between integrated and non-integrated (or ‘pluralist’) economies.