The Economics of the British Stage, 1800-1914
The Economics of the British Stage, 1800-1914
复制标题
英国舞台经济学，1800 年至 1914 年
DOI：
10.1093/hwj/53.1.264
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nancy J. M. Henry
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nancy J. M. Henry
13评论（ds）受到法律的审查和攻击。梅恩斯关于它所享有的社会伪装的论点远远解释了为什么会这样--它根本就没有被描述为一种性手段。这种伪装早已被剥去，现在那些保护女性手淫快乐免受国家侵扰和窥探的人所能得到的只是一种古老的医学传统，即论证女性高潮快乐的必要性。我们可能希望快乐的权利可以从功能障碍的讨论中解脱出来，特别是家庭价值观和婚姻纽带的维护，“宪法规定的性高潮权利”可能有一天会被确立。显然，这一天还很遥远。与此同时，我们总是可以像亚拉巴马州蒙哥马利市市长所说的那样--如果一个女人“想要一个振动器，她应该去坐在洗衣机上”。3最好是，一个假设，而做家庭的洗衣房。谈论社会伪装！
13reviews (ds) come under legal scrutiny and attack. Maines’s argument concerning the social camouflage it enjoyed goes far to explain how this could be so–it was simply not characterized as a sexual device. That camouflage long since stripped away, all that is now available to those who would protect female masturbatory pleasure from the intrusive and prurient prying of the State is a venerable medical tradition of arguing for the necessity of female orgasmic pleasure. We might wish that the right to pleasure could be cut free of talk of dysfunction and, especially, of family values and the preservation of the marital bond–that a ‘constitutional right to an orgasm’might someday be established. That day is clearly a long way off. In the meantime, we can always do as the mayor of Montgomery, Alabama advised–if a woman ‘wants a vibrator she ought to go and sit on a washing machine’. 3 Preferably, one assumes, while doing the family’s laundry. Talk about social camouflage!