Three-dimensional audio versus head-down traffic alert and collision avoidance system displays.
Three-dimensional audio versus head-down traffic alert and collision avoidance system displays.
复制标题
三维音频与低头交通警报和防撞系统显示。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Marc T. Pittman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Begault;Marc T. Pittman
在一项实验中评估了平视听觉显示器在态势感知方面的优势，该实验旨在测量和比较两种条件下捕获视觉目标的获取时间：标准平视交通警报和防撞系统显示和三维(3-D)音频交通警报和防撞系统演示。(用于3D音频呈现的技术允许立体声耳机用户潜在地将声音定位在3D听觉空间中的任何外部位置)。10名商业航空公司的机组人员在NASA-Ames机组人员-飞行器系统研究设施高级概念飞行模拟器的全任务模拟条件下进行了测试。场景软件生成与激活3-D听觉咨询(平视听觉条件)或标准视听TCAS咨询(带有单声道音频警报的地图显示)的飞机相对应的目标。结果表明，两种情况下的目标捕获时间有显著差异，比3-D音频交通警报和防撞系统条件下的捕获时间快500ms。
The advantage of a head-up auditory display for situational awareness was evaluated in an experiment designed to measure and compare the acquisition time for capturing visual targets under two conditions: standard head-down Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System display and three-dimensional (3-D) audio Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System presentation. (The technology used for 3-D audio presentation allows a stereo headphone user to potentially localize a sound at any externalized position in 3-D auditory space). Ten commercial airline crews were tested under full-mission simulation conditions at the NASA-Ames Crew-Vehicle Systems Research Facility Advanced Concepts Flight Simulator. Scenario software generated targets corresponding to aircraft that activated a 3-D aural advisory (the head-up auditory condition) or a standard, visual-audio TCAS advisory (map display with monaural audio alert). Results showed a significant difference in target acquisition time between the two conditions, favoring the 3-D audio Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System condition by 500 ms.