Three Dimensions of User Risk-Taking: Individual Differences in the TriRB

Three Dimensions of User Risk-Taking: Individual Differences in the TriRB
复制标题

用户冒险的三个维度:TriRB 中的个体差异

DOI:
10.1177/1071181319631406
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Joachim Meyer
Joachim Meyer
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Noam Ben Asher;Joachim Meyer

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Ben-Asher和Meyer(2018)开发了一个计算机系统中的风险相关行为模型,名为风险相关行为三联体(TriRB)。它确定了三种行为-暴露在风险中,使用安全功能和对安全迹象的反应。不同的因素对三种行为的影响程度不同。我们报告了一个有83名参与者参加的实验,他们执行了类似俄罗斯方块的任务,旨在学习TriRB。我们还收集了四种衡量个体冒险差异的数据(BART、DOSPERT和效用函数中风险厌恶评估问卷)。我们计算了TRRB中的行为与风险度量之间的相关性。不同的风险衡量标准与这三种行为相关,支持这一观点,即这确实是三种不同的风险相关行为,而不是一般潜在的冒险倾向的表现。我们讨论了这些发现对网络安全研究和实践的一些启示。
Ben-Asher and Meyer (2018) developed a model of risk-related behavior in computer systems, named the Triad of Risk-related Behavior (TriRB). It identified three behaviors – the exposure to risk, the use of security features and the responses to security indications. Various factors affected the three behaviors differently. We report an experiment with 83 participants who performed the Tetris-game like task, designed for studying the TriRB. We also collected data on four measures of individual differences in risk-taking (BART, DOSPERT and questionnaires on assessing risk aversion in the utility functions). We computed the correlations between the behaviors in the TriRB and the risk measures. Different risk measures were correlated with the three behaviors, supporting the notion that these are indeed three different risk-related behaviors and not expressions of a general underlying tendency to take risks. We discuss some implications of these findings for cybersecurity research and praxis.