The Impact of Farmland Transfer on Rural Households' Income Structure in the Context of Household Differentiation: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province, China
The Impact of Farmland Transfer on Rural Households' Income Structure in the Context of Household Differentiation: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province, China
复制标题
农户分化背景下农地流转对农户收入结构的影响——以中国黑龙江省为例
DOI：
10.3390/land10040362
复制
发表时间：
2021-04-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Liu, Ye
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chen, Lili;Chen, Hongsheng;Liu, Ye
农地流转是影响发展中国家农户收入和农村可持续发展的重要因素。然而，近年来的研究对于农地流转对农户收入的影响，由于忽略了农户的分户差异以及农地流转对收入结构影响的差异，得出了有争议的结论。本文以中国谷物主产区黑龙江省为研究区，基于倾向得分匹配（PSM）模型，评估不同农户农地流转对收入结构的影响。结果表明：农地流转农户的总收入显著增加，农地流转农户的总收入明显减少，其中1个兼职农户的收入增幅最大，其次是纯农业农户和2个兼职农户；1个兼职农户的收入降幅最小，其次是纯农业农户和2个兼职农户。因为1户非全日制农户农地流转时，农业收入和补贴的增加大于外业收入的减少，而2户非全日制农户农地流转时，外业收入不增反减。得出结论：(1)应加强鼓励纯农业和非全日制家庭流转耕地，鼓励非全日制家庭流转耕地，加强农村养老互助的发展。(2)完善农地流转市场与促进剩余劳动力非农就业需要同步推进。(3)对农户给予农业补贴。
Farmland transfer is an important factor affecting rural households' income and sustainable development of rural areas in developing countries. However, recent studies have reached controversial conclusions on how farmland transfer affects rural households' income because of ignoring the household differentiation and the difference in the impacts of farmland transfer-in and transfer-out on the income structure. Taking the Heilongjiang province, the major cereal production area in China, as the study area, the paper aims to estimate the impacts of farmland transfer-in or transfer-out of different rural households on income structure based on the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) model. Results showed that the total income of all rural households transferring-in farmland increased significantly while the income decreased after transferring-out farmland, and I part-time households have the largest increase, followed by pure-agricultural households and II part-time households, whereas I part-time households has the smallest reduction, followed by pure-agricultural households and II part-time households. Because the increase in the agricultural income and subsidies was greater than the decrease in the outworking income for I part-time households transferring-in farmland, while the outworking income not increasing but decreasing when II part-time households transferring-out farmland. We can conclude that (1) encouraging pure-agricultural and I part-time households to transfer farmland in and II part-time households to transfer out of farmland, and develop mutual assistance for the aged in rural areas should be strengthened. (2) Improving the farmland transfer market and promoting non-agricultural employment of surplus-labor need to be synchronized. (3) Agricultural subsidies should be provided to cultivators.