MULTIDIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT OF COPING - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION

MULTIDIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT OF COPING - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.844
复制
发表时间:
1990-05-01
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
PARKER, JDA
PARKER, JDA
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
ENDLER, NS;PARKER, JDA

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

回顾了几种现有的应对自我报告措施和使用这些工具的相关研究。许多这些应对措施都存在各种心理测量上的弱点。构建了多维应对量表(MCI)作为自我报告工具,确定了三种应对方式:任务导向、情绪导向和回避导向。本文提出了对MCI的多维性的支持,以及对MCI应对量表可靠性的支持。本文提出了两项评估MCI有效性的研究。第一项研究通过与《应对方式》问卷的比较,对MCI的结构效度进行评估。第二项研究还通过比较MCI与抑郁、焦虑、A型行为、神经质和外向性的测量来评估MCI的标准效度。综上所述,MCI是一种有效且高度可靠的应对方式多维度测量方法。
Several existing self-report measures of coping and the relevant research using these instruments are reviewed. Many of these coping measures suffer from a variety of psychometric weaknesses. A self-report instrument, the Multidimensional Coping Inventory (MCI), was constructed that identifies 3 types of coping styles: task-oriented, emotion-oriented, and avoidance-oriented coping. Support for the multidimensional nature of the MCI is presented, along with support for the reliability of the MCI coping scales. Two studies are presented that assessed the validity of the MCI. The 1st study assessed the construct validity of the MCI by comparing it with the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. The 2nd study also assessed the criterion validity of the MCI by comparing it with measures of depression, anxiety, Type A behavior, neuroticism, and extraversion. Overall, the results suggest that the MCI is a valid and highly reliable multidimensional measure of coping styles.