Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species
Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044
复制
发表时间：
2019-01-01
影响因子：
8.7
通讯作者：
Richardson, David M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shackleton, Ross T.;Adriaens, Tim;Richardson, David M.
外来入侵物种是全球环境变化的主要驱动因素，需要采取一系列管理干预措施来管理它们对生物多样性、生态系统服务、人类福祉和当地生计的影响。利益相关者参与被广泛提倡，以整合入侵物种管理中的不同知识和观点，并处理潜在的利益冲突。我们回顾了ISI科学网上关于入侵科学中利益相关者参与（利益相关者（行动者）参与决策、管理行动和知识创造的过程）的文献，以评估和理解已经做了什么（查看使用的方法和方法、参与的利益相关者和参与的结果），并为未来的工作提出建议。在过去十年中，对入侵科学中利益相关者参与的研究有所增加，有助于提高科学知识，并有助于政策制定和管理的共同实施。然而，仍然存在许多挑战，可以使参与更加有效。例如，大多数研究只涉及一个利益相关者群体，被动地使用问卷，主要是为了评估当地的知识和看法。虽然对管理和政策规划有用，但这些利益相关者不是积极的参与者，也没有双向的知识流动。为了使利益相关者的参与更有用，我们鼓励更多的整合和协作参与，以：(1)改善共同设计、共同创造和共同实施研究和管理行动；(2)促进社会学习并向利益相关者提供反馈；(3)加强自然科学和学术界以外的合作和伙伴关系（跨学科和跨学科合作）；(4)探讨了提高利益相关者在入侵科学研究和管理中的参与度的实践建议和政策建议。这将有助于促进不同利益攸关方更好地合作，使与生物入侵有关的问题得到更全面、更成功的解决。(C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd.版权所有。
Invasive alien species are a major driver of global environmental change and a range of management interventions are needed to manage their effects on biodiversity, ecosystem services, human well-being and local livelihoods. Stakeholder engagement is widely advocated to integrate diverse knowledge and perspectives in the management of invasive species and to deal with potential conflicts of interest. We reviewed the literature in the ISI Web of Science on stakeholder engagement (the process of involving stakeholders (actors) in decision making, management actions and knowledge creation) in invasion science to assess and understand what has been done (looking at approaches and methodologies used, stakeholders involved, and outcomes from engagement) and to make recommendations for future work.Research on stakeholder engagement in invasion science has increased over the last decade, helping to improve scientific knowledge and contributing towards policy formulation and co-implementation of management. However, many challenges remain and engagement could be made more effective. For example, most studies engage only one stakeholder group passively using questionnaires, primarily for assessing local knowledge and perceptions. Although useful for management and policy planning, these stakeholders are not active participants and there is no two-way flow of knowledge. To make stakeholder involvement more useful, we encourage more integrative and collaborative engagement to (1) improve co-design, co-creation and co-implementation of research and management actions; (2) promote social learning and provide feedback to stakeholders; (3) enhance collaboration and partnerships beyond the natural sciences and academia (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary collaboration); and (4) discuss some practical and policy suggestions for improving stakeholder engagement in invasion science research and management. This will help facilitate different stakeholders to work better together, allowing problems associated with biological invasions to be tackled more holistically and successfully. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.