A secondary analysis examining the performance of the State Optimism Measure (SOM) compared to the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) in measuring optimism over time.
A secondary analysis examining the performance of the State Optimism Measure (SOM) compared to the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) in measuring optimism over time.
复制标题
二次分析检查了状态乐观测量 (SOM) 与修订后的生活取向测试 (LOT-R) 在测量乐观情绪方面的表现。
DOI：
10.1080/08870446.2022.2126472
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Hoeppner,BettinaB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hoeppner,SusanneS;Millstein,RachelA;Siegel,KaitlynR;Carlon,HannahA;Harnedy,LaurenE;Chung,Wei-Jean;Huffman,JeffC;Hoeppner,BettinaB
Objective:Optimism is an important factor impacting health and human functioning. Originally conceptualized as a trait, increasing evidence indicates that optimism can change over time and could be an intervention target. Measures are needed that can capture changes in optimism.Design:In this secondary analysis, we compared the performance of a newly developed state measure, the State Optimism Measure (SOM), to the widely used trait measure, the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), in detecting changes over time during a disruptive life event: the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.Main Outcome Measures:Participants (n = 81) were nondaily smokers participating in a smoking cessation intervention, who completed the SOM and LOT-R before and after the initial COVID-19 outbreak.Results:Optimism declined from pre- to post-COVID-19 outbreak, as assessed by both scales (LOT-R:p=.0147,gav=0.23; SOM:p<.0001,gav=0.56). The change detected was greater when measured by the SOM (p<.0001). Changes in optimism were correlated with concurrent changes in perceived stress, positive affect, and negative affect.Conclusion:Our results suggest that the SOM has a greater sensitivity to detect within-person changes in optimism than the LOT-R and highlight the SOM’s utility for longitudinal studies assessing changes in optimism.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5
作者：
COHEN, S;KAMARCK, T;MERMELSTEIN, R
通讯作者：
MERMELSTEIN, R
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Lakens D
通讯作者：
Lakens D
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
SCHEIER, MF;CARVER, CS;BRIDGES, MW
通讯作者：
BRIDGES, MW
区分老年人的乐观与悲观：乐观更重要还是不悲观更重要？
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Robinson-Whelen,S;Kim,C;MacCallum,RC;Kiecolt-Glaser,JK
通讯作者：
Kiecolt-Glaser,JK
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Segerstrom, Suzanne C.;Evans, Daniel R.;Eisenlohr-Moul, Tory A.
通讯作者：
Eisenlohr-Moul, Tory A.