Consensual qualitative research: An update

Consensual qualitative research: An update
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
复制
发表时间:
2005-04-01
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Ladany, N
Ladany, N
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hill, CE;Knox, S;Ladany, N

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

作者回顾了自1997年C。E.希尔,B。J. Thompson和E. N.威廉姆斯(1997年)。在首先描述了CQR的核心组成部分和哲学基础之后,作者研究了它是如何在共识过程,偏见,研究团队,数据收集,数据分析以及撰写文章的结果和讨论部分方面应用的。根据这些领域中出现的问题,作者提出了修改方法的建议。作者得出结论,CQR是一种可行的定性方法,并提出了对方法本身进行研究的几个想法。
The authors reviewed the application of consensual qualitative research (CQR) in 27 studies published since the method's introduction to the field in 1997 by C. E. Hill, B. J. Thompson, and E. N. Williams (1997). After first describing the core components and the philosophical underpinnings of CQR, the authors examined how it has been applied in terms of the consensus process, biases, research teams, data collection, data analysis, and writing up the results and discussion sections of articles. On the basis of problems that have arisen in each of these areas, the authors made recommendations for modifications of the method. The authors concluded that CQR is a viable qualitative method and suggest several ideas for research on the method itself.