Understanding Mean Score Differences Between the e‐rater® Automated Scoring Engine and Humans for Demographically Based Groups in the GRE® General Test
Understanding Mean Score Differences Between the e‐rater® Automated Scoring Engine and Humans for Demographically Based Groups in the GRE® General Test
复制标题
了解 GRE® 普通考试中基于人口统计的群体的 e‐rater® 自动评分引擎与人类之间的平均分数差异
DOI:
10.1002/ets2.12192
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
David M. Williamson
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chaitanya Ramineni;David M. Williamson
Notable mean score differences for thee‐rater® automated scoring engine and for humans for essays from certain demographic groups were observed for theGRE® General Test in use before the major revision of 2012, called rGRE. The use of e‐rater as a check‐score model with discrepancy thresholds prevented an adverse impact on the examinee score at the item or test level. Despite this control, there remains a need to understand the root causes of these demographically based score differences and to identify potential mechanisms for avoiding future instances of discrepancy. In this study, we used a combination of statistical methods and human review to propose hypotheses about the root cause of score differences and whether such discrepancies reflect inadequacies of e‐rater, human scoring, or both. The human rating process was found to be influenced strongly by the scale structure and did not fully correspond to the e‐rater scoring mechanism. The human raters appeared to be using conditional logic and a rule‐based approach to their scoring, while e‐rater uses linear weighting of all the features. These analyses have implications for future research and operational policies for the scoring of the rGRE.