Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles
Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles
复制标题
DOI：
10.1001/jama.287.21.2805
复制
发表时间：
2002-06-05
影响因子：
120.7
通讯作者：
Bero, LA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lee, KP;Schotland, M;Bero, LA
背景识别发表高质量研究的科学期刊的能力将有助于临床医生、科学家和卫生政策分析师选择最新的医学文献进行review.Methods评估期刊特征是否包括（1）同行评审状态，（2）引用率，（3）影响因子，（4）发行量，（5）手稿接受率，（6）MEDLINE索引，（7）期刊质量，（8）期刊质量，（9）期刊质量，（10）期刊质量，（11）期刊质量，（12）期刊质量，（13）期刊质量，（14）期刊质量，（15）期刊质量，（16）期刊质量，（17）期刊质量，（18）期刊质量，（19）期刊质量（7）布兰登/希尔图书馆列表索引是研究论文方法学质量的预测因子，我们对243篇发表在普通内科期刊上的涉及人类受试者的原始研究论文进行了横断面研究。所有期刊都报告了同行评审过程，并在MEDLINE上进行了索引。在控制文章类型的模型中（随机对照试验[RCT]或非RCT），期刊引用率是最具统计学意义的预测因子（每增加一倍增加0.051; 95%置信区间[CI]，0.037-0.065; P
Context The ability to identify scientific journals that publish high-quality research would help clinicians, scientists, and health-policy analysts to select the most up-to-date medical literature to review.Methods To assess whether journal characteristics of (1) peer-review status, (2) citation rate, (3) impact factor, (4) circulation, (5) manuscript acceptance rate, (6) MEDLINE indexing, and (7) Brandon/Hill Library List indexing are predictors of methodological quality of research articles, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 243 original research articles involving human subjects published in general internal medical journals.Results The mean (SD) quality score of the 243 articles was 1.37 (0.22). All journals reported a peer-review process and were indexed on MEDLINE. In models that controlled for article type (randomized controlled trial [RCT] or non-RCT), journal citation rate was the most statistically significant predictor (0.051 increase per doubling; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.037-0.065; P