A reply to Shachak.
A reply to Shachak.
复制标题
对沙恰克的回复。
DOI:
10.1093/jamia/ocab022
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Gottlieb,LauraM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pantell,MatthewS;Adler-Milstein,Julia;Wang,MichaelD;Prather,AricA;Adler,NancyE;Gottlieb,LauraM
Dear JAMIA editors and readers: We appreciate Shachak’s letter regarding our article entitled “A Call for Social Informatics.” 1 In it, he argues that social informatics is a poor term to describe a field dedicated to the application of information technologies to capture and apply social data in conjunction with health data in order to advance health. 2 We continue to believe that it is a useful term, however, and value this opportunity to share our reasoning.In selecting the term social informatics, we were aware of the existence of a field of social informatics, which focuses on the study of the interaction of various aspects of information and communication technologies with institutional and cultural contexts. 3 However, this use of the term social informatics is rarely found in the biomedical informatics literature. In a PubMed search for the term social informatics, we identified 67 publications (not including our article) with the term. We were able to retrieve 64 of these articles; only 6 used the term in the article itself. In the remaining 58, the term appeared as part of the author affiliation or institutional description (eg, from a School or Department of Social Informatics). We believe that this offers strong evidence that the term is not in widespread use in the biomedical informatics literature. In writing our article, we considered other terms for this new field, such as clinical social informatics and social determinants of health informatics. However, the bulkiness and awkwardness of these options were problematic in comparison with the more succinct term of social informatics.