Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling

Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling
复制标题

DOI:
10.1017/s1355617706061091
复制
发表时间:
2006-11-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Gorenstein, Clarice
Gorenstein, Clarice
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fuentes, Daniel;Tavares, Hermano;Gorenstein, Clarice

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

病态赌博是一种冲动控制障碍。通过神经心理学测试和自我报告量表分别研究了冲动性。尽管一些研究试图将这些方法关联起来,但它们在病态赌徒 (PG) 中的相互作用尚未得到充分探索。在这项研究中,我们将 214 名 PG(162 名有合并症,52 名无合并症)与 82 名健康志愿者进行了比较,比较了 Go/No-go 任务的反应时间和错误数量,以及 Barratt 冲动量表 (BIS) 的分数。 PG 在通过/不通过任务中犯了更多错误,并且在自我报告量表上得分较高。神经心理学测试和 BIS 组成了一个多项逻辑模型,该模型比具有一种或另一种测量类型的模型更好地区分 PG 和非赌徒。冲动似乎是一种多维现象,而 PG 是一个异质群体,其中存在不同类型的冲动。
Pathological Gambling is an impulse control disorder. Impulsivity has been investigated separately by neuropsychological tests and self-report scales. Although some studies have tried to correlate these approaches, their interaction has not been sufficiently explored among pathological gamblers (PG). In this study, we have compared 214 PG (162 with comorbidity and 52 with no comorbidity) to 82 healthy volunteers regarding the reaction time and number of errors at Go/No-go tasks, and scores on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS). PG have committed more errors at the Go/No-go tasks and presented higher scores on the self-report scale. The neuropsychological tests and BIS composed a multinomial logistic model that discriminated PG from non-gamblers better than models having one or another type of measure. Impulsivity seems to be a multi-dimensional phenomenon, and PG a heterogeneous population in which different types of impulsivity are present.