Inter-rater reliability of clinician-rated outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services
Inter-rater reliability of clinician-rated outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10488-007-0134-y
复制
发表时间：
2007-11-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Heyerdahl, Sonja
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hanssen-Bauer, Ketil;Aalen, Odd O.;Heyerdahl, Sonja
本研究调查了评价者间的可靠性时，169个171名临床医生在10个挪威儿童和青少年心理健康服务评价20个书面的小插曲，使用以下结果的措施：健康的国家儿童和青少年的结果量表（HoNOSCA），儿童的全球评估量表（CGAS）和全球评估的心理社会残疾（GAPD）。三名临床医生对患者和插图进行了评级。在插图中，HoNOSCA总分的组内相关系数（ICC）为0.81（单量表0.470-96），CGAS为0.61，GAPD为0.60。患者的可靠性并不低。评分者的职业、经验和诊所对评分没有影响。
This study investigated the inter-rater reliability when 169 out of 171 clinicians working in 10 Norwegian child and adolescent mental health services rated 20 written vignettes using the following outcome measures: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA), Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Global Assessment of Psychosocial Disability (GAPD). Three clinicians rated both patients and vignettes. On vignettes the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the HoNOSCA total score was 0.81 (single scales 0.470-96), for the CGAS 0.61 and for the GAPD 0.60. The reliability was not lower on patients. The rater's profession, experience or clinic did not have effect on the scores.