A COMPARISON OF 2 DIET HISTORY QUESTIONNAIRES THAT MEASURE USUAL FOOD-INTAKE
A COMPARISON OF 2 DIET HISTORY QUESTIONNAIRES THAT MEASURE USUAL FOOD-INTAKE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/01635588909514005
复制
发表时间：
1989-01-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
ESTEVE, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BOUTRON, MC;FAIVRE, J;ESTEVE, J
这项研究是在准备对大肠腺瘤性息肉或结肠癌患者进行病例对照研究时进行的。这是为了比较两种饮食历史方法来评估个人目前的饮食摄入量。在其中一份问卷中，受试者接受了关于他们每餐食物摄入量的采访，在另一份问卷中，受试者接受了广泛的食物群体的采访。根据性别和年龄进行比较的两组20名志愿者接受了一名营养师的采访，这名营养师使用了其中一份问卷。通过问卷调查获得的饮食数据与14天的饮食记录进行了比较。受试者被告知验证程序的重要性。无论调查问卷的类型如何，调查问卷和14天记录的营养素和食物的平均日摄入量相当相似。因此，每餐问卷与记录之间的相关性比按食物分组的问卷与记录之间的相关性更显著。在使用三层瓷砖时，按膳食的问卷似乎比按食物组的问卷更能对个人的食物摄入量进行分类。尽管将这些结果外推到患者群体并不简单，但事实似乎表明，在不使用饮食模式的情况下采访患者可能会比健康受试者更不可靠。在正在进行的病例对照研究中，食物组更倾向于按餐填写问卷。需要进一步的研究才能知道这些结果是否可以外推到对过去饮食和非拉丁人群的研究。
This study was conducted during the preparation of a case‐control study on patients with adenomatous polyps or cancer of the large bowel. It was done to compare two dietary history methods for assessing individual current dietary intakes. Subjects were interviewed concerning their food consumption by meal in one of the questionnaires and by broad food groups in the other questionnaire. Two groups of 20 volunteers, comparable according to sex and age, were interviewed by a dietitian who used one of the questionnaires. Data on diets obtained with the questionnaire were compared with those of a 14‐day dietary record. The subjects were informed of the importance of the validation procedure. Whatever the type of questionnaire, mean daily intakes of nutrients and foods were rather similar for the questionnaires and for the 14‐day records. Thus, there were more significant correlations between the questionnaire by meal and the record than between the questionnaire by food group and the record. When using tertiles, it appears that the questionnaire by meal was better at classifying individuals with regard to their food intake than the questionnaire by food groups. Although extrapolating these results to a patient population is not straightforward, it seemed likely that interviewing patients on diet without using a pattern of meals would prove even less reliable than for healthy subjects. The questionnaire by meal was preferred to the questionnaire by food groups for the ongoing case‐control study. Further studies are needed to know whether these results could be extrapolated to studies on past diet and to non‐Latin populations.