Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component?
Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
复制
发表时间：
2006-12-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Little, Todd D.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adlof, Suzanne M.;Catts, Hugh W.;Little, Todd D.
简单阅读观认为阅读理解是单词识别和听力理解的产物。虽然许多研究都集中在单词识别的准确性上，但最近的注意力已经转向了单词识别的流畅性。目前的研究调查了是否应该在简单阅读观中增加一个单独的流畅性成分。对604名二年级、四年级和八年级的儿童进行了一系列阅读和语言测试。这些儿童中大约有一半在幼儿园有语言和/或非语言认知障碍，但采用加权程序来减少这种抽样特征可能带来的潜在偏差。在控制单词识别准确性和听力理解后，使用结构方程模型来确定流畅性是否占阅读理解的唯一方差。进行了个人概况分析，以确定尽管单词识别准确性和听力理解良好，但流利程度较差的个体参与者的数量。结果表明，流利性并不能解释阅读理解的独特差异，很少有个体在单词识别准确性或听力理解之外存在流利性问题。因此，似乎不应该在简单阅读视图中添加一个单独的流畅性组件。
The Simple View of Reading states that reading comprehension is the product of word recognition and listening comprehension. Whereas much research has focused on word recognition accuracy, recent attention has been directed toward word recognition fluency. The current study investigated whether a separate fluency component should be added to the Simple View of Reading. A battery of reading and language measures was administered to 604 children in second, fourth, and eighth grades. Approximately half these children had language and/or nonverbal cognitive impairments in kindergarten, but weighting procedures were used to reduce the potential bias this sampling characteristic may have entailed. Structural equation modeling was used to determine whether fluency accounted for unique variance in reading comprehension after controlling for word recognition accuracy and listening comprehension. Individual profile analyses were conducted to determine the number of individual participants who had poor fluency in the spite of good word recognition accuracy and listening comprehension. Results showed that fluency did not account for unique variance in reading comprehension and that few individuals had problems in fluency separate from word recognition accuracy or listening comprehension. Thus, it does not appear that a separate fluency component should be added to the Simple View of Reading.