Examining the Possibility of Expanding the Use of Digital Images Recorded in the “Audio-Visual Recording of Custodial Interrogation” System

Examining the Possibility of Expanding the Use of Digital Images Recorded in the “Audio-Visual Recording of Custodial Interrogation” System
复制标题

探讨扩大使用“羁押讯问录音录像”系统中记录的数字图像的可能性

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-62803-1_4
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
David Kreps, Taro Komukai, Gopal TV, Kaori Ishii, eds., Human-Centric Computing in a Data-Driven Society 14th IFIP TC9 Human Choice and Computers, Springer
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mariko Nakamura
Mariko Nakamura
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
二杉健斗;二杉健斗;二杉健斗;二杉健斗;二杉健斗;二杉健斗;中尾祐人;住永佳奈;Kana Suminaga;住永佳奈;住永佳奈;Kana Suminaga;Ichiro Taida;泰田伊知朗;Ichiro Taida;Ichiro Taida;泰田伊知朗;泰田伊知朗;Mariko Nakamura

文献摘要

相似文献

日本最近采用了“拘留审讯视听记录”制度,以核实被告证词中所载的供词或其他不利陈述的非自愿性。虽然新系统中记录的数字图像应该被用作补充证据,但它们似乎可以用来直接证明所声称的事情的真实性,这是一个有待解决的问题。这篇文章考虑了数字图像是否可以用来证明有罪或无罪,如果可以的话,它们是否需要满足比证词更严格的要求。首先,本文论述了将传统传闻证据排除适用于数字图像的法律的依据。其次,说明了数字图像的使用如何能够满足传闻证据规则下的对抗制的法律的要求。文章的结论是,如果被告或辩护律师有弹劾的机会,这些录音可能被用来证明有罪或无罪。
Japan has recently introduced the “Audio-Visual Recording of Custodial Interrogation” system to verify the voluntariness of confessions or other disadvantageous statements of the accused that are contained in their depositions. Although digital images recorded in the new system are supposed to be used as supplementary evidence, it appears that they can be used to directly prove the truth of the matter asserted, which is the question to be left open. This article considers whether the digital images can be used to prove guilt or innocence, and if so, whether they need to meet more strict requirements than those for depositions. First, the article discusses the legal grounds pertaining to the application of a conventional hearsay exception to the digital images. Second, it explains how the use of the digital images, which could be concerning, can meet the legal demands of the adversary system underlying the Hearsay Rule. The article concludes that these recordings may be used to prove guilt or innocence if the accused or defense counsels have the meaningful opportunity for impeachment.