Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I x J chi-square tables
Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I x J chi-square tables
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/00131640021970871
复制
发表时间：
2000-10-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Gardner, RC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
MacDonald, PL;Gardner, RC
作者使用蒙特卡罗方法评估了3 × 4卡方列联表中两次细胞残差事后检验和四次成对对比事后检验的对比前后和实验I型错误率。在三个样本量和独立性和同质性的零假设下，评估了六个事后程序。研究结果表明，当对α水平进行适当调整时，细胞调整残差法提供了足够的实验I型错误率控制，Gardner成对事后处理程序比其他成对处理程序具有几个优势。独立性模型和同质性模型都是如此。
The authors used Monte Carlo methods to assess the per-contrast and experimentwise Type I error rates of two post hoc tests of cellwise residuals and four post hoc tests of pairwise contrasts in 3 x 4 chi-square contingency tables. The six post hoc procedures were evaluated under three sample sizes and under the null hypotheses of independence and homogeneity. Results of the study indicate that the cellwise adjusted residual method provided adequate experimentwise Type I error rate control when appropriate adjustments to the alpha level were made, and the Gardner pairwise post hoc procedure provided several advantages over the other pairwise procedures. This was true for both the independence and homogeneity models.