What’s wrong with the sociology of punishment?
What’s wrong with the sociology of punishment?
复制标题
惩罚社会学出了什么问题？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Braithwaite
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Braithwaite
通过大卫加兰（2001）的工作，惩罚社会学被视为贡献了有益的见解，但由于它关注的是是否以及如何惩罚的社会选择，而不是选择是否通过惩罚或一系列其他重要策略进行监管，因此它可能没有那么有用。加兰的系谱学方法的一个问题是，系谱学的分支被锯掉了--那些被选择的调节工具分散惩罚的分支。这使我们看不到对街头犯罪的主要惩罚性监管的混合性，这种混合性被对套房犯罪的更多风险预防和恢复性监管技术所重塑，反之亦然。
The sociology of punishment is seen through the work of David Garland (2001) as contributing useful insights, but less than it might because of its focus on societal choices of whether and how to punish instead of on choices of whether to regulate by punishment or by a range of other important strategies. A problem in Garland’s genealogical method is that branches of the genealogy are sawn off—the branches where the chosen instruments of regulation decentre punishment. This blinds us to the hybridity of predominantly punitive regulation of crime in the streets that is reshaped by more risk-preventive and restorative technologies of regulation for crime in the suites, and vice versa.