From Military Geography to militarism's geographies: disciplinary engagements with the geographies of militarism and military activities
From Military Geography to militarism's geographies: disciplinary engagements with the geographies of militarism and military activities
复制标题
从军事地理学到军国主义地理学：与军国主义和军事活动地理学的学科接触
DOI：
10.1191/0309132505ph579oa
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
7.1
通讯作者：
R. Woodward
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Woodward
本文回顾了当代英语人文地理学对军国主义和军事活动的地理构成和表达的研究。确定了三种主要方法，并讨论了每种方法的优点、局限性和见解。这些是：传统的军事地理学，与国家军事话语的军事力量密切相关;广泛的政治地理学，侧重于武装冲突的空间性;和研究从整个社会科学对军国主义的政治经济和社会文化地理，特别是在非冲突情况下。本文最后提出了一些建议，为进一步的实证和理论研究，并认为在道德基础上的人文地理学明确关注军事地理的所有形式。
This paper reviews contemporary approaches in Anglophone human geography to the geographical constitution and expression of militarism and military activities. Three main approaches are identified, and the merits, limitations and insights of each are discussed. These are: traditional Military Geography, intimately associated with state military discourses of military power; a broad political geography, focused on the spatiality of armed conflict; and research from across the social sciences on the political economies and sociocultural geographies of militarism, particularly in nonconflict situations. The paper concludes with some suggestions for further empirical and theoretical inquiry, and argues on moral grounds for a human geography explicitly concerned with military geographies in all their forms.