Discussion on the paper by Professor Wu, "A fresh look at effect aliasing and interactions: some new wine in old bottles"
Discussion on the paper by Professor Wu, "A fresh look at effect aliasing and interactions: some new wine in old bottles"
复制标题
对吴教授论文的讨论,“A fresh view oneffectaliasingandinteractions:somenewwineinold Bottles”
DOI:
10.1007/s10463-017-0641-x
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
1
通讯作者:
Ryo Yoshida
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Trung Anh Dinh;Shigeru Yamashita and Tsung-Yi Ho;Ryo Yoshida
I express much respect to the great achievements in history of statistical science that have been made by Professor Wu and his coauthors. In conventional experimental design, the factor interactions are often aliased as exemplified for the aliased two-factor interactions in the 24− 1 design. It has been shown that the CME reparameterization based on Eq 3 or Eq 4 in Wu’s paper could be used to de-alias the aliased interaction effects in regular 2k− q design.As discussed by Professor Wu, the CME analysis has the great applicability not only in designed experiments but also in observation studies. Let us focus on the twofactor interaction between A and B with each having two levels,+ or−, that indicates the presence or absence of the respective factor. Conventionally, the interaction effect is to quantify the product-type influence of A and B on a response variable, which is defined to be the difference of the mean effects between the same signed (both are present or absent) and opposite-signed states. This describes merely one aspect of the interaction in a broader context. The CMEs bring to us another look on the interaction, which provide scientifically more meaningful insights in many applications. Mak and Wu (2017) developed a comprehensive framework of the CME analysis in observation studies with a variable selection procedure based on the effect grouping (Mak and Wu 2017).